<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Funferal &#187; Arizona</title>
	<atom:link href="http://funferal.org/blog/tag/arizona/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://funferal.org/blog</link>
	<description>engraved and retouched and edgewiped and pudden-padded</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:08:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Podcasting a temporary choice for prospective community radio stations</title>
		<link>http://funferal.org/blog/2007/11/14/podcasting-a-temporary-choice-for-prospective-community-radio-stations/</link>
		<comments>http://funferal.org/blog/2007/11/14/podcasting-a-temporary-choice-for-prospective-community-radio-stations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Ó Baoill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternative Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://funferal.org/blog/2007/11/14/podcasting-a-temporary-choice-for-prospective-community-radio-stations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article about an Arizona group who filed in the recent community radio licensing window in the United States discusses their hopes and plans. The Phoenix area, where they are based, is, it seems, the largest metropolitan area in the United States (3 million people) without a community station. Of particular interest to me was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An article about an Arizona group who filed in the recent community radio licensing window in the United States <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/community/chandler/articles/1113ev-radio1114.html">discusses their hopes and plans</a>. The Phoenix area, where they are based, is, it seems, the largest metropolitan area in the United States (3 million people) without a community station. Of particular interest to me was the mention that &#8220;while the foundation is awaiting an FCC decision, it is trying to raise money to provide podcast programs on its <a href="http://www.azcmf.org">Web site</a>.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://funferal.org/blog/2007/11/14/podcasting-a-temporary-choice-for-prospective-community-radio-stations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Editors arrested for disclosing broad trawl for user records</title>
		<link>http://funferal.org/blog/2007/10/19/editors-arrested-for-disclosing-broad-trawl-for-user-records/</link>
		<comments>http://funferal.org/blog/2007/10/19/editors-arrested-for-disclosing-broad-trawl-for-user-records/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Ó Baoill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freedom of the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet logs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subpoena]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://funferal.org/blog/2007/10/19/editors-arrested-for-disclosing-broad-trawl-for-user-records/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A story developing before our eyes. Early this afternoon (Pacific Time) I got a mail on Lauren Weinstein&#8217;s Privacy mailing list, pointing to a subpoena directed at the editors of the Phoenix New times: In a breathtaking abuse of the United States Constitution, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas, and their increasingly unhinged [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A story developing before our eyes. Early this afternoon (Pacific Time) I got a mail on Lauren Weinstein&#8217;s Privacy mailing list, pointing to <a href="http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2007-10-18/news/breathtaking-abuse-of-the-constitution/full">a subpoena directed at the editors of the Phoenix New times</a>:<br />
<blockquote>In a breathtaking abuse of the United States Constitution, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas, and their increasingly unhinged cat&#8217;s paw, special prosecutor Dennis Wilenchik, used the grand jury to subpoena &#8220;all documents related to articles and other content published by Phoenix New Times newspaper in print and on the Phoenix New Times website, regarding Sheriff Joe Arpaio from January 1, 2004 to the present.&#8221; </p></blockquote>
<p>Weinstein points to the lessons to be learnt by website operators:<br />
<blockquote>Trust is at the heart of users&#8217; relationships with the Web services that they patronize.  If such services put themselves in a position where they and their users may be victimized by unreasonable outside demands for log and other related data, the risks to the Web and Internet at large are immense indeed. </p></blockquote>
<p>Now, word, via the Stubblefield list, that <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/1019newtimes1019.html">the editors who disclosed the subpoenas have been arrested</a>:<br />
<blockquote>Grand jury proceedings are secret, and the two wondered in the opening paragraphs of the article whether they could face legal repercussions for making the subpoena public, but they viewed the subpoena as an attack on freedom of the press. </p></blockquote>
<p><b>Updated (2007-10-20)</b>The charges against the newspaper <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/1020newtimes1020.html">have now been dropped</a>. The details in the new story make for fascinating reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://funferal.org/blog/2007/10/19/editors-arrested-for-disclosing-broad-trawl-for-user-records/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

